Last Update 28 Aug 26
SpaceX’s path to $300B may be on Earth
SpaceX’s first earnings call materially changed how I think about the company.
The biggest surprise was AI infrastructure. SpaceX disclosed that it invested around US$15B into AI infrastructure last quarter, and its compute business is already serving major AI companies including Google and Anthropic.
More importantly, SpaceX reportedly has over US$80B of external AI compute revenue contracted through 2029, with Musk expecting AI to soon become SpaceX’s largest source of revenue.
The advantage appears to be speed.
SpaceX has demonstrated an ability to bring enormous amounts of compute online far faster than traditional data centre projects, partly by using its own power generation rather than waiting years for grid connections. Customers are willing to pay a significant premium because, in the current AI race, getting compute today can be far more valuable than getting cheaper compute years from now.
Musk believes each gigawatt of AI capacity could generate US$30–50B of annual revenue, with SpaceX targeting at least 10 GW of capacity. At the low end, that implies a potential US$300B annual AI compute business if the company can execute.
That number is extraordinary considering my original valuation exercise assumed SpaceX would need roughly US$313B of total revenue in 10 years to justify its valuation.
I originally assumed that revenue would need to come roughly equally from Space, Starlink and AI. That assumption may already be outdated. AI infrastructure on earth alone could potentially approach that level much sooner.
There are still enormous execution risks, and I would not value SpaceX today assuming Musk’s US$300B target becomes reality.
But the earnings call has changed the equation for me. The valuation still looks demanding based on current revenue, but if SpaceX can turn its ability to build infrastructure quickly into a durable AI compute business, the path to growing into that valuation looks considerably more plausible than it did at IPO.
I should have bought some when it was 500b off IPO price last month. Thought it would have stayed there longer. The stock is fairly valued today and I won't touch it without a sweet discount.
SpaceX is expected to go public under the ticker SPCX. There has been a huge amount of attention leading up to the listing, which isn’t surprising. SpaceX is one of the most important private companies of the last decade and has built leading positions across launch services, satellite internet, and increasingly AI infrastructure.
I believe SpaceX is one of the most impressive companies in the world. It has repeatedly achieved things that many people thought were impossible and has created advantages that competitors may struggle to replicate.
At the same time, SpaceX is more complex than simply a rocket company. In reality, it is a collection of businesses operating across space transportation, communications infrastructure, and artificial intelligence.
Understanding those different segments is important because they each have very different economics.
The foundation of the company remains its space business.
This includes Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Dragon, Starship, government contracts, commercial launches, and future lunar and deep-space ambitions.
In 2025, the launch segment generated approximately $4.1 billion in revenue.
SpaceX now dominates global launch activity by volume, making it a critical part of the modern space industry. Companies building satellites, defense systems, and space-based infrastructure often rely on SpaceX to get their payloads into orbit.
Launch services are capital intensive.
Developing and operating rockets requires enormous investment, and programs such as Starship continue to consume significant resources. The strategic value of the business is clear, but long-term profitability remains harder to assess.
Starlink is arguably the most important part of the company today.
The satellite internet network has grown rapidly and now serves millions of customers across more than 100 countries.
Revenue reached roughly $11.4 billion in 2025, representing the majority of SpaceX’s overall sales.
Unlike the launch business, Starlink benefits from recurring subscription revenue. As the network scales, each additional customer helps spread infrastructure costs across a larger base.
Starlink may be the most straightforward part of the SpaceX story. It combines a large addressable market with recurring revenue and a growing global footprint.
The third major piece of the business is AI.
Following the acquisition of xAI, SpaceX now has exposure to AI models, computing infrastructure, and the X platform.
The combination gives the company access to data, distribution, and computing resources, all of which have become increasingly important in the AI ecosystem.
This segment generated an estimated $3.2 billion in revenue during 2025.
While AI remains highly competitive and outcomes are difficult to predict, it represents a potentially significant growth opportunity alongside SpaceX’s existing businesses.
–––
What makes SpaceX unusual is that investors are not buying a single business.
They are buying exposure to several large themes at once: space, global communications, and AI. These are heavy infrastructure businesses that SpaceX has managed to build with an incredible momentum.
The challenge is determining how much of that future potential is already reflected in the IPO valuation.
There is little doubt that SpaceX has built exceptional businesses.
The harder question for investors is whether the price they pay leaves enough room for future returns.
----
What it takes for SpaceX to be worth 17.5 trillion valuation at IPO time?
Using Simply Wall St Future Multiple Valuator, for the stock to be Fairly Value today and be worth the offering price at US$135/share:
- Approx. US$313B Revenue in 10 years
- Net profit margin at 40% — Net income ~US$125B
- PE multiple in 10 years at 30x (to deserve this multiple they would still grow earnings at around 10% in year 10) — Future market cap ~US$3.75T
What combination of Space, Starlink and AI could realistically produce ~US$313B of annual revenue within 10 years?
Let's assume 3 businesses are equal contribution as we don't know how the world would be like in 10 years
Are these assumptions ambitious? Absolutely.
Are they impossible? Maybe not.
If AI dramatically increases global productivity, the world economy itself could become much larger than it is today. Entirely new industries may emerge. Space tourism could become accessible to wealthy consumers. Manufacturing, mining or energy generation could expand beyond Earth. Satellite connectivity may become as fundamental as electricity is today. AI infrastructure could become one of the largest markets ever created. Google apparently admitted they currently spend close to a billion monthly to borrow compute power from xAI.
Many of these ideas sound like science fiction today, but so did reusable rockets and thousands of internet satellites not long ago.
Whether SpaceX ultimately achieves this is yet to know. The exercise simply shows the scale of business required to justify today’s valuation assumptions.
In the meantime, I’ll remain an observer, watching one of the most fascinating IPOs in history unfold. I’ll also be digging deeper into the downstream businesses that could benefit from SpaceX’s fresh capital, where I suspect there may be more obvious undervalued opportunities.
Have other thoughts on Space Exploration Technologies?
Create your own narrative on this stock, and estimate its Fair Value using our Valuator tool.
Create NarrativeHow well do narratives help inform your perspective?
Comments
1 commentsDisclaimer
QuanD is an employee of Simply Wall St, but has written this narrative in their capacity as an individual investor. QuanD holds no position in NasdaqGS:SPCX. Simply Wall St has no position in any companies mentioned. Simply Wall St may provide the securities issuer or related entities with website advertising services for a fee, on an arm's length basis. These relationships have no impact on the way we conduct our business, the content we host, or how our content is served to users. This narrative is general in nature and explores scenarios and estimates created by the author. The narrative does not reflect the opinions of Simply Wall St, and the views expressed are the opinion of the author alone, acting on their own behalf. These scenarios are not indicative of the company's future performance and are exploratory in the ideas they cover. The fair value estimate's are estimations only, and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and they do not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Note that the author's analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.